Is Your Mathematical Precision Compromised by Ghost Artifacts?

When drafting complex proofs or visualizing geometric structures, every pixel represents a critical piece of data. However, I’ll make a strong affirmative statement: your intellectual rigor is being undermined if you are working on an unverified display. I firmly believe that "visual noise"—such as backlight bleeding or stuck pixels—can lead to subtle misinterpretations of notation or data plots, especially during late-night research sessions. It is illogical to strive for 100% mathematical accuracy while viewing your work through hardware that introduces its own errors. I’ve started using a black screen for display testing to ensure my panel is as flawless as the logic I'm trying to document. Do you think we, as researchers, pay enough attention to the physical tools of our cognition, or is the quality of the display irrelevant to the abstract nature of mathematics?